This writer believes President Trump and his support staff were wiretapped by the 0bama administration and proffers this evidence.
Last year on a November 7th, an article from Heat Street states:
“Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.
Contrary to earlier reporting in the New York Times, which cited FBI sources as saying that the agency did not believe that the private server in Donald Trump’s Trump Tower which was connected to a Russian bank had any nefarious purpose, the FBI’s counter-intelligence arm, sources say, re-drew an earlier FISA court request around possible financial and banking offenses related to the server. The first request, which, sources say, named Trump, was denied back in June, but the second was drawn more narrowly and was granted in October after evidence was presented of a server, possibly related to the Trump campaign, and its alleged links to two banks; SVB Bank and Russia’s Alfa Bank. While the Times story speaks of metadata, sources suggest that a FISA warrant was granted to look at the full content of emails and other related documents that may concern US persons.”
Now lets re-examine that statement. They were at first denied in June, so they would have had to appeal their request. One may ask, who would they appeal their request to? The FISA Court of appeals, which is a three Judge panel. All of these Judges just so happened to be appointed by … Bill Clinton!
Now one has to ask, what was the clandestine 0bama A.G. and Mr. Clinton’s conversation was about on the tarmac back in June?
“Attorney General Loretta Lynch faced continuing questions Thursday related to an awkward encounter with former president Bill Clinton after the two crossed paths Monday at Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport.”
Was this June encounter of chance? This writer thinks not!
The Heat Street article goes on further to state:
“The FBI agents who talked to the New York Times, and rubbished the ground-breaking stories of Slate ( Franklin Foer) and Mother Jones (David Corn) may not have known about the FISA warrant, sources say, because the counter-intelligence and criminal sides of the FBI often work independently of each other employing the principle of ‘compartmentalization’.
The FISA warrant was granted in connection with the investigation of suspected activity between the server and two banks, SVB Bank and Alfa Bank. However, it is thought in the intelligence community that the warrant covers any ‘US person’ connected to this investigation, and thus covers Donald Trump and at least three further men who have either formed part of his campaign or acted as his media surrogates. The warrant was sought, they say, because actionable intelligence on the matter provided by friendly foreign agencies could not properly be examined without a warrant by US intelligence as it involves ‘US Persons’ who come under the remit of the FBI and not the CIA. Should a counter-intelligence investigation lead to criminal prosecutions, sources say, the Justice Department is concerned that the chain of evidence have a basis in a clear warrant.
In June, when the first FISA warrant was denied, the FBI was reportedly alarmed at Carter Page’s trip to Moscow and meetings with Russian officials, one week before the DNC was hacked. Counter intelligence agencies later reported to both Presidential candidates that Russia had carried out this hack; Donald Trump said publicly in the third debate that ‘our country has no idea’ if Russia did the hacking. The discovery of the Trump Tower private Russian server, however, communicating with Alfa Bank, changed matters, sources report.”
To this writer this is very interesting, as it was during this time that she discovered, what she believes the ‘rigging’ of the election.
One has to wonder why has this received such little attention, other than this website? Why has MSM changed the narrative to the Russians?
The explanation of why the ‘election results‘ were published one week in advance of the elections, was simply given that it was a “program test” …. It is easy to simply go to the archived web page of these election results and review the html coding to understand that the explanation of ‘testing programming’ is false, as it was manually coded.
As well, it was discovered by Aaron Diamant of WBS-TV Channel 2 that DHS had tried to ‘hack’ voter databases, which was later described as DHS contractors.
“ATLANTA – Channel 2 Investigative Reporter Aaron Diamant has learned two more states’ election agencies have confirmed suspected cyberattacks linked to the same U.S. Department of Homeland Security IP address as last month’s massive attack in Georgia.” (Continue reading) …
And why were three DHS IT contractors fired from DHS?
“In an ironic twist, it appears it may not have been ‘The Russians’ that hacked America’s political system last year. As The Daily Caller reports, three brothers (Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan) who managed office IT for members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and other lawmakers were abruptly relieved of their duties on suspicion that they accessed congressional computer networks without permission.” (Continue reading) …
And let us not forget that is was those ‘mean ole Russians‘ that tried to warn us!